stillcreasebeast wrote:Dehuntshigwa'es wrote:nathanc wrote:new england wrote:Some bad publicity for Middlebury College. This may fly under the radar, but cannot be ignored. It's sometimes a shame to see lacrosse players get in trouble with the law, whether they are guilty or not.
http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/arti ... Middlebury
Not sure that an off-campus party with no significant disturbances and underage drinking is really that shocking. I find it hard to believe there is a school in the country that would pretend that underage drinking doesn't happen. Buying "light" beer is the more embarrassing thing to me.
If law enforcement visited any college campus on a Fri or Sat night they could probably arrest 50% of the students at that school; unless there were mid-terms that week

. Must have been a slow night in Vermont......Question is do you reduce the drinking age back to 18???? The current law I believe at least limits an 18 yr old from getting in a car and driving to a bar . It's not a perfect situation but probably the best we've got
Dehunt- check out these URL's sponsored by Middlebury president-emeritus and W&L'71 alum, John McCardell, Jr.
http://www.chooseresponsibility.org/ &
http://www.amethystinitiative.orgThe current alcohol laws are a joke. School and local papers love listing violators for "underage consumption" and "open container" violations. Yet after seeing hundreds of these violations printed; I've never seen a report of anyone busted for blowing dope & holding - which as we all know continues to be illegal at age 21. The hypocrisy is staggering. We have the highest drinking age int he western world. In my experience the young people today are light years more responsible than when I was a functional alcoholic in college. Personally I'm in favor of huge alcohol and driving penalties like they have in Germany. They have BAC zero tolerance law in drivers under 21. Typically they start at a .05 BAC with automatic license suspensions. Have a great time, walk, catch a cab or find a sober pledge to do the driving.
Sorry about the rant - this is one of my peeves.
I'm with you creasebeast. Years ago when dwi laws were not really strictly adhered to by law enforcement the Legal drinking age was 18. There were many fatal accidents involving the indestructible young where alcohol played a part. The drinking age was changed to 21. A short time later Law enforcement became very strict (thank god) where dwi is concerned and it has changed for the better across all ages. I believe the legal drinking age should be changed back to 18. We are placing a huge burden on our colleges and universities in giving them the job of policing today's young adult college students. We can send them to war at 18 but they can't have a drink?????
Today's DWI stats show that the age for the highest percentage of DWI occurrences is from 21-34, the 18-20 year old's (under-aged) are slightly behind (yaerd.org). Should we change the legal drinking age to 34? The single biggest deterrent to DWI has been strict law enforcement regardless of age and it has worked well. Will it ever be 100%, never, like anything else.
The way it sounds is that these Middlebury kids were doing what probably 50% of college students nationwide do every weekend, and nothing more, hardly newsworthy. I understand that binge drinking at colleges is a real problem but keeping the drinking age at 21 is not a deterrent , let's remove this responsibility and liability from the colleges and universities and place it back on our young adults to know and learn their boundaries.